Skip to content

Use Case — Commercial Real Estate

Energy decisions across a building portfolio, on one record

Office, retail, and mixed-use portfolios evaluate charging, storage, submetering, and electrical upgrades building by building. GRIDSTROM keeps the asset, project, vendor, and service history connected so portfolio decisions are made on comparable information.

Operating Context

The environment this work happens in

  • Multiple buildings under different ownership entities, leases, and utility accounts.
  • Capital planning cycles that must reconcile tenant demand, base building limits, and asset hold period.
  • Property teams coordinating vendors on site while corporate teams approve spend.
  • Energy scope competing with roofing, HVAC, and life-safety capital in the same budget.

The Fragmented-Data Problem

Where the record breaks today

  • Site feasibility in consultant PDFs, utility capacity in email threads.
  • Charging or metering data in separate vendor portals per building.
  • Vendor quotes in individual inboxes, not comparable side by side.
  • No single list of what is installed, who services it, and what it cost.

Financial Decision

Which buildings receive energy capital this cycle, and on what basis?

Installed cost by site, including electrical and civil scope, not equipment alone.
Incentive and program eligibility, where applicable and verified.
Operating cost exposure: demand charges, tariff structure, and service obligations.
Hold period, lease structure, and who captures the benefit.

Operational Workflow

How the work moves

  1. 01

    Screen the portfolio

    Buildings are ranked with consistent inputs rather than one-off studies.

  2. 02

    Model the scenario

    Scope, cost, and operating assumptions are compared as scenarios on the same project.

  3. 03

    Route the approval

    The decision packet carries its inputs, assumptions, and reviewers.

  4. 04

    Issue and track

    Request, quote, and order move to a vendor with scope attached.

  5. 05

    Operate and service

    Commissioned equipment becomes an asset record with work order history.

Representative Product Experience

Portfolio screening — Northline Property Group (demonstration data)

Candidate sites ranked on comparable inputs, each linked to its project and asset records.

Portfolio screening — Northline Property Group (demonstration data)
RecordSiteScopeStageEstimated CapEx
PRJ-2041Harbor Point CenterCharging + service upgradeScenario review$486,000
PRJ-2044Cedar Works PlazaStorage + submeteringApproval routed$742,500
PRJ-2051Fairmount ExchangeCharging (phase 1)Quotes received$213,900
PRJ-2058Latham Street OfficeFeasibilityIntakePending

Records shown are fictional demonstration data. Capabilities are released progressively.

AssetProjectVendorRequestQuoteOrderWork order

Outputs by Role

What each role gets from the same record

Executive

  • Portfolio view of committed, approved, and proposed energy capital
  • Site ranking with the inputs behind it

Finance / Planning

  • Scenario comparison with documented assumptions
  • Approval record with reviewer, date, and version

Operations

  • Asset register by building with vendor and warranty context
  • Open exceptions and work order status

Partner

  • Structured request with site conditions attached
  • Quote and order with defined scope

Integration Approach

Connect what is already in place

  • Vendor-neutral intake: existing spreadsheets, ERP exports, monitoring portals, and equipment telemetry are read into a canonical asset record.
  • GRIDSTROM is not the general ledger. ERP and accounting platforms remain systems of record for financial postings.
  • Property and accounting exports map to sites and cost objects without replacing the property management system.
  • Equipment and network portals contribute telemetry to the canonical asset record where an interface is available.

Security & Governance

How access and evidence are handled

Role-based access, least-privilege permissions, and an append-only history for approvals and status changes. Documents and evidence are stored privately, and access is scoped to the organization, project, and role that requires it.

Measurement

What success could be measured

Metric categories only. Results depend on the organization, its data, and how the work is adopted; no outcome is promised.

Decision cycle

Elapsed time between intake and a recorded approval decision.

Estimate integrity

Variance between approved estimate and final order value.

Asset coverage

Share of installed energy equipment represented by a complete asset record.

Service responsiveness

Time from exception detection to a closed, verified work order.

Next Step

Discuss your use case

Bring the sites, systems, and decisions you are working with. We will walk through how the record would be structured.

Roles served: Executive · Finance / Planning · Operations · Partner