Skip to content

Use Case — Data Centers & Critical Power

Critical power assets with continuous, connected evidence

AI and compute growth is adding load faster than most facilities planned for. GRIDSTROM keeps UPS, battery, switchgear, and generation records connected to their projects, vendors, and service evidence across sites.

Operating Context

The environment this work happens in

  • Rapid load growth and constrained utility interconnection timelines.
  • Concurrent maintainability requirements and strict change control.
  • Multiple vendors covering UPS, batteries, generation, and controls.
  • Audit and compliance expectations for testing and maintenance evidence.

The Fragmented-Data Problem

Where the record breaks today

  • Battery test results held in vendor reports rather than the asset record.
  • Capacity planning in spreadsheets disconnected from installed inventory.
  • Maintenance evidence scattered across service providers.
  • Replacement timing estimated rather than tracked per asset.

Financial Decision

What critical power capital is required, in what sequence, and with what replacement horizon?

Installed capacity against committed and forecast load.
Battery and UPS replacement horizon by installed date and duty.
Service contract structure and coverage across vendors.
Interconnection and long-lead equipment timing.

Operational Workflow

How the work moves

  1. 01

    Inventory critical assets

    Every UPS string, battery, and generator carries an asset record.

  2. 02

    Plan capacity

    Projects reference installed capacity, not a separate spreadsheet.

  3. 03

    Govern the approval

    Change control and capital approval share one evidence chain.

  4. 04

    Execute with vendors

    Requests, quotes, and orders route to qualified providers.

  5. 05

    Test and verify

    Test results attach to the asset as durable evidence.

Representative Product Experience

Critical power register — Ashfield Data Campus (demonstration data)

UPS and battery assets with service state, last verified test, and replacement horizon.

Critical power register — Ashfield Data Campus (demonstration data)
RecordAssetSystemStateReplacement horizon
AST-1204UPS module A1Hall 1Operating2031
AST-1211Battery string A1-2Hall 1Watch2028
AST-1230Generator G2YardTest complete2036
AST-1244Battery string B3-1Hall 2ExceptionAssessment open

Records shown are fictional demonstration data. Capabilities are released progressively.

AssetProjectVendorRequestQuoteOrderWork order

Outputs by Role

What each role gets from the same record

Executive

  • Capacity and replacement outlook across sites
  • Capital sequencing view

Finance / Planning

  • Replacement schedule feeding budget cycles
  • Approved versus committed spend by system

Operations

  • Concurrent maintainability status by system
  • Open exceptions and vendor response

Technician

  • Procedure, history, and prior evidence in the work order
  • Structured test result capture

Partner

  • Scoped service request per asset
  • Order and completion tied to the record

Integration Approach

Connect what is already in place

  • Vendor-neutral intake: existing spreadsheets, ERP exports, monitoring portals, and equipment telemetry are read into a canonical asset record.
  • GRIDSTROM is not the general ledger. ERP and accounting platforms remain systems of record for financial postings.
  • DCIM, BMS, and monitoring exports map to canonical asset records without replacing those systems.
  • Vendor service reports are attached as evidence against the asset they describe.

Security & Governance

How access and evidence are handled

Role-based access, least-privilege permissions, and an append-only history for approvals and status changes. Documents and evidence are stored privately, and access is scoped to the organization, project, and role that requires it.

Measurement

What success could be measured

Metric categories only. Results depend on the organization, its data, and how the work is adopted; no outcome is promised.

Evidence coverage

Share of critical assets with current, attached test evidence.

Replacement visibility

Share of assets with a recorded replacement horizon.

Exception resolution

Time from exception to verified recovery.

Capacity accuracy

Alignment between planned capacity and installed inventory.

Next Step

Discuss your use case

Bring the sites, systems, and decisions you are working with. We will walk through how the record would be structured.

Roles served: Executive · Finance / Planning · Operations · Technician · Partner